AI agents for content strategy

Decide what to say and in which order, from evidence rather than instinct.

11 agents, each with its inputs, outputs and review level checked by a person.

Content strategy agents decide what to say and in which order, from evidence rather than instinct. They take an offer, its audience and approved research, and return a brief, a scored set of angles or a calendar with owners and review dates. They sit between research and production: the research agents gather evidence, the strategy agents turn it into a plan, the drafting agents write from the plan. The listings record the inputs each agent expects and the shape of the plan it returns.

Use them when the question is what to write rather than how to write it. A team that already has a backlog needs a planner that respects capacity and previous results; a team starting a programme needs an agent that finds angles worth testing and says which evidence supports each one.

The agents

Groups that share agents with this one.

Questions

What is the difference between a brief and an angle report?

A brief tells a writer what one piece should cover and why. An angle report scores several candidate messages for one offer so you can choose which to test. Both appear under this use case; the outputs section says which an agent returns.

Do these agents write the content too?

Usually not. They hand a plan to a drafting agent or a person. Several listings name the usual next step, which is the drafting agent that takes the plan as input.