AI agents for code review
Review pull requests for bugs, security and style before a person merges.
6 agents, each with its inputs, outputs and review level checked by a person.
Code review agents read pull requests and leave comments on bugs, security issues, style and missing tests before a person merges. They run on every push, know the repository's conventions where you configure them, and never merge on their own in the agents listed here. The listings record the hosts each agent connects to, what it comments on, how rules are set and whether a person accepts each comment.
Use them to catch the routine issues so human review can focus on design. Check whether the agent can be tuned with your own rules, whether it summarises the change as well as commenting, and how it is priced, which is usually per seat or per repository.
The agents
- Augment Codeby Augment CodeCoding agents grounded in a context engine for reviews, tests, migrations and ticket-to-PR work.Subscription, from $20/moNeeds configurationOptional reviewDetails
- CodeRabbitby CodeRabbitReviews every pull request with comments, one-click fixes and pre-merge checks.Subscription, from $24 per developer/mo billed annuallyNeeds configurationHuman reviewDetails
- Cursorby CursorCoding agent in an editor, terminal and the cloud that plans, builds and tests changes for review.Freemium, from $20/moWorks instantlyOptional reviewDetails
- Factoryby FactoryDroids that take a backlog item, implement it, review it and ship it through your existing tools.Subscription, from $20/moDeveloper setupOptional reviewDetails
- GitHub Copilot coding agentby GitHubAssign a GitHub issue to Copilot and get back a pull request to review.Freemium, from $10/moWorks instantlyHuman reviewDetails
- Qodoby QodoAgentic pull request review across repositories, in the IDE, CLI and Git workflow.Subscription, from $30/moNeeds configurationHuman reviewDetails
No agent matches. Clear the search or choose another filter.
Related
Groups that share agents with this one.
Questions
Will a review agent block merges?
Only if you configure it as a required check. By default the agents here comment and a person decides; the review level on each listing reflects that.
Does it see my whole codebase?
It reads the repository it is connected to in order to review changes in context. The vendor's security page, linked from the listing, describes retention; the catalogue does not verify it.